Ana "La Barbilona" Martell

Visual Artist . Poet. Activist.

Alleged Libyan rape victim Iman al-Obeidi breaks through to the international press

April5

The 29-year-old Libyan woman made international headlines last weekend after she burst into a hotel housing the foreign press corps. Visibly bruised, she alleged that she had been kidnapped and sexually assaulted by 15 members of strongman Muammar Gadhafi’s armed forces. Libyan security then whisked her away from the battery of cameras and tape recorders.

After the widely publicized incident, Libyan officials kept mum about al-Obeidi’s whereabouts, and the country’s state-run media carried out an aggressive smear campaign painting her as a prostitute and madwoman. Her family, however, said that she was a post-graduate law student studying in Tripoli.

But al-Obeidi emerged from seclusion Monday to offer more public testimony about her alleged gang-rape and captivity.

“I showed to the journalists my hands and legs. I was bound and tied up. I was beaten and tortured,” she told CNN’s Anderson Cooper through a translator in an interview that aired in part on his Monday prime time show, according to a transcript the network provided to The Cutline. “For two days they violated my freedom … I want to convey to the journalists that the brigades who are supposed to protect people, look what they did to me.”

In addition to the Cooper interview, Obeidi recounted the story of her initial detention to NPR and a Libyan opposition satellite channel. Her ordeal began, she said, when soldiers stopped her taxi at a checkpoint in Tripoli.

Once she was detained, she said, the assaults began. “They had my hands tied behind me,” she told Cooper, “and they had my legs tied, and they would hit my while I was tied, and bite me on my body, and they would pour alcohol in my eyes so that I would not be able to see, and they would sodomize me with their rifles, and they would not let us go to the bathroom. We were not allowed to eat or drink. This is because I resisted them and tried to stop them from raping me.”

During her second imprisonment–after she burst into the hotel lobby full of journalists–al-Obeidi said that she was pressured to recant the rape claims on Libyan state television. She refused, she said, “because the TV station does not tell the truth.”

Details of al-Obeidi’s release remain sketchy. Her present location is unconfirmed, but she reportedly made a second attempt to speak with journalists at the hotel this past weekend and was again rebuffed.

“There is no safe place for me in Tripoli,” she told Cooper. “All my phones are monitored. Even this phone I am speaking on right now is monitored and I am monitored. And yesterday, I was kidnapped by a car and they beat me in the street and then brought me here after they dragged me around. They told me whenever you leave the house we will do this to you, meaning that I was not allowed to leave the house or see the journalists. I had asked to see the journalists. They beat and hit me and sent me back. Tell all the human rights organizations to return me safely to my family.”

Also on Monday, a Libyan government spokesman told the Associated Press that al-Obeidi had made a deal with the country’s attorney general that prohibited her from speaking with reporters.

“She broke her agreement with the attorney general by trying to speak to the media and was taken away,” the spokesman told the newswire, which also spoke with a woman the government claimed was an attorney representing al-Obeidi in the rape case. “She doesn’t want to speak to journalists because she said she wants to get justice through the courts,” the woman told the AP. “But she is comfortable, living with her sister in Tripoli, and is in good spirits.”

Al-Obeidi has come forward with her story at a critical juncture in the efforts of Gadhafi’s regime to clamp down on the work of the foreign media. Journalists working out of Tripoli say they are contending with tightly monitored and almost surreal working conditions. Some even fear that their hotel-prepared food is being spiked with sedatives, according to NPR.

“That was why the outburst of Iman al-Obaidi … was so revelatory,” writes Liz Sly in The Washington Post. “In an instant, she crystallized the harsh realities of the Libya the government goes to such lengths to prevent journalists from seeing.”

It’s also possible that the widespread media exposure saved al-Obeidi’s life.

The New York Times’ David Kirkpatrick, who is on the ground in Tripoli, notes: “Thanks to the publicity in her first interviews … she may have gotten off easy. Others in her situation, human rights advocates say, are typically confined for years in so-called rehabilitation facilities, subjected to unscientific virginity tests, deprived of any entertainment or education except lessons in Islam, and subjected to solitary confinement or handcuffs for any sign of resistance to authority.”

As for al-Obeidi, she told Cooper she has constant nightmares of death and wishes to leave Tripoli, but is no longer afraid.

(Jerome Delay/AP)

Add to Del.cio.us RSS Feed Add to Technorati Favorites Stumble It! Digg It!
    www.sajithmr.me

Expensive Aliens: How Much Do Illegal Immigrants Really Cost?

April4

Arizona’s Gateway For Illegal Immigrants

States usually bear the brunt of the burden.

Arizona state treasurer Dean Martin says his state loses between $1.3 billion and $2.5 billion each year on illegal immigrants. In addition to the fiscal costs of incarcerating and educating illegal immigrants and their families, Arizona also faces a variety of other indirect costs, says Martin, who favors Arizona’s controversial new immigration law.

Arizona has higher car insurance rates, he says, because illegal immigrants who cross the border often steal cars that they use to move further into the country. Undocumented workers are also more likely to perpetrate hit-and-run accidents, he says, because they are afraid of being deported if they are caught. Not only does this add to car insurance rates, but it also stretches police resources, he says.

“Unfortunately we are the gateway for illegal immigration, and that puts a bigger strain on our economy than other states,” he says.

Illegal Aliens’ Economic Contributions Count Too

Analysts on the other side of the debate, however, disagree with the math behind those numbers.

Wendy Sefsaf, a spokeswoman for the Immigration Policy Center which favors a lenient immigration policy, says that conservative analysts overestimate the costs because undocumented workers don’t even qualify for unemployment or medical benefits.

At the same time, those whose jobs are paid legally – at least fifty percent, by some estimates – end up paying social security and other payroll taxes without ever collecting benefits. Since illegal immigrants are believed to constitute up to 5 percent of the U.S. economy, their tax contributions will mean a revenue windfall for legal residents.

Advocates of more lenient immigration policies also disagree with the purely fiscal approach. Simply weighing tax receipts against public spending doesn’t show the full picture, they say, since illegal immigrants also create tremendous economic value.

“Illegal immigrants are good for our economy,” says IPC’s Sefsaf. “They make our labor force and our economy bigger. Sure, you could kick them all out, but then you would have to shrink the economy.”

Sefsaf also doesn’t buy the traditional argument that illegal immigrants are stealing U.S. jobs: most legal residents work in middle-rung jobs and would not want to take low-paying jobs as fruit pickers or nannies.

After weighing the financial pros against the cons, she says the U.S. economy comes out slightly ahead due to the presence of illegal aliens.

The Cost of Illegals: A Moot Point?

Jeffrey Passel, a senior demographer at the Pew Hispanic Center, takes the debate one step further. He points out that most attempts to find a meaningful number are usually futile, since the data are so difficult to collect. And anyway, he says, what is the point?

“We don’t generally ask these questions about anybody else,” says Passel. He points out that using the “cost” argument, one could make a case against parents who generally benefit more from public schools than the taxes they pay. “It’s not a subject that there is a definitive answer to.”

read more on the link

http://abcnews.go.com/Business/illegal-immigrants-cost-us-100-billion-year-group/story?id=10699317&page=2

Add to Del.cio.us RSS Feed Add to Technorati Favorites Stumble It! Digg It!
    www.sajithmr.me